Over - documented incidents between - and - in - countries, as reported by - sources. Behind each case is at least one person — sometimes thousands. Across all documented cases, approximately - entities have had their financial access restricted. Money has always carried power. It is now routinely weaponised.
Every payment carries a message. Every time you donate to a journalist, an NGO, or to a human rights activist to support their cause and work, you are saying something important. If the transaction is censored, then the statement stops. This is what financial censorship looks like when it runs through a bank.
The faces and organisations above had bank accounts until the day they did not. A frozen card. A closed account. A donation that never arrived. Some were named extremists and terrorists. Most were never named at all. They simply stopped being able to rent, defend themselves, or pay anyone who stood with them. Often the people involved, including the donors, were harassed, censored, beaten, and jailed, and killed.
The record below documents closures - the moments accounts were frozen, terminated, or seized. It is the visible layer, and the easiest to verify. Beneath it sit two larger forms - exclusion and sanction - that produce no headline, generate no court filing, and silence far more people than any closure ever has.
No cases match the current filters.
Know a case that isn't here? See a case that shouldn't be here?
When money is weaponised, a fallback has to work without asking permission. Under self-custody, Bitcoin can move without a bank, payment processor, or state permission. That's a fact. In this dataset, that mattered for Anti-Corruption Foundation, Feminist Coalition, Freedom Convoy Canada, Meduza, WikiLeaks, and many others.
Bitcoin is the focus here because it is the most available open money fallback today: more wallets, more donors, more liquidity, and more ways to convert back into local currency. Those practical constraints matter when rent, salaries, or legal bills are due.
Bitcoin is not a perfect solution. Used well it keeps money moving, but used carelessly it can make things worse.
No government, no bank, and no company can stop your Bitcoin from moving. That is the whole point. However, the same property means there is no helpdesk, no customer service, and no way to reverse a mistake. If you lose access to your wallet, the money is irreversibly gone. This means that while the security it real, so is the responsibility. As such, a fallback works only if people have practiced custody, backups, privacy, and spending before they depend on it.
Bitcoin is often described as anonymous. It is not. Every transaction is recorded on a public ledger that anyone can read, permanently. Used carelessly, Bitcoin reveals more about your finances than a bank statement would, because a bank statement is private and the blockchain is not. Privacy tools exist, including Lightning for low-cost off-chain payments and Cashu ecash for private Bitcoin-backed bearer tokens, but the difference between safety and exposure is knowledge, and the time to learn it is before the account gets frozen, not after.
Bitcoin moves across borders without middlemen. A supporter in Oslo can fund a journalist in Minsk directly, without asking permission from the financial system of either country. But rent and salaries are still paid in local currency. At some point the Bitcoin has to become money your landlord accepts, and that conversion - the off-ramp - is where the banking system meets you again. A working fallback plan accounts for this gap. It also accounts for volatility: if your organisation holds donations before spending them, you need a strategy for converting, holding, or using more stable instruments for the portion you will spend soon.
Note: open payment systems can be misused - for terrorism, ransomware, and worse. So can cash, the internet, and cars. The question is whether restricting the tool stops the harm or merely inconveniences it while foreclosing its legitimate uses. That question applies here as elsewhere.
The tools exist, but using them well takes practice. Holding your own bitcoin means no bank stands between you and your money. It also means no bank to call if something goes wrong. Practice wallets, backups, recovery, privacy, and small payments before a crisis. The worst time to learn self-custody is after an account is frozen.
Every organisation in this dataset had a bank account until the day they did not. Having a second way to receive money, set up before a crisis, is often the difference between carrying on and shutting down. The technical side can be done in an afternoon. Helping donors get comfortable with it takes longer. BTCPay Server is a free tool an organisation can run on its own, with no company in the middle taking a cut or able to cut access.
Privacy is a right, and most people using open money are right to guard it. Organisations that ask the public for money are in a different position. Charities, NGOs, advocacy groups, and nonviolent movements depend on public trust, and trust depends on showing where the money goes. Choosing to publish payments is not a compromise of open money's values. It is a use of them. Free and open-source tools like Clams make this simple, and answer in advance the usual accusations about hiding money.
Open money infrastructure is not maintained by one company. It depends on maintainers, wallets, privacy tools, nodes, documentation, and grant-funded developers. Bitcoin's protocol is maintained by independent engineers reviewing Bitcoin Core, hardening Lightning implementations, and building the tools that keep transactions confirming and keys in users' hands. Many are funded through organisations like OpenSats, Brink, and the Human Rights Foundation's Bitcoin Development Fund. A fallback is only as strong as the infrastructure people can actually use.
Financial censorship works partly because it is invisible. A bank closure generates no headline, no arrest record, no court filing. The only counter to invisibility is documentation. If you witness or experience financial censorship, record it - and submit it here.
